Today I went to go and see the new Gregory Crewdson Cathedral of Pines at The Photographers Gallery exhibition.
The first thing that struck me was the lighting, the lighting was a masterclass, I spent ages on each image to see how it was lit.
Secondly the size of the prints were very consistent but also roughly the size of a picture window. Once I listened to the behind the scenes interview this is something Crewdson confirmed as well. They are of the size that feels like you are looking through a window into another world, into Becket Massachusetts where this series was shot.
There is a posing style that Crewdson use, and it's so distinct that as soon as you see an image you know it's one of his. I think it will be a very difficult pose to get, it needs to be lifeless, no performance, as still as the model can be.
The scale of the surroundings really makes these images. Crewdson would often shoot fairly wide to show off the sheer scale of the pines.
There is an overall sense of waiting for something to happen. In each of the images there are people waiting around.
In this series Crewdson uses mirrors frequently giving the viewer extra information of what is going on in the room, away from the view of the camera.
At first glance the images feel like large scale historic landscape paintings but with people in them.
My takeout of the day was that these are super simple, humble, normal households and Crewdson with the help of a large team, has changed those spaces into something totally different. Where before it was an old run down barn it was now a space with someone in it, telling a story and leaving the viewer with as many questions as answers.
Crewdson states in an interview that he sees himself as a story teller but he is very aware that unlike film (which his images looks like they've been lifted from) does not have a beginning or an ending. He can only tell the story with that one frame and there is a remarkable amount of story in each of the frames.
Overall a very enjoyable exhibition and one I would highly recommend.
References: The Photographers Gallery: Aug17
]]>1. The proof that documentary photography is not a fad or a vogue lies in the history of other movements in photography.
2. It is life that is exciting and important, and life whole and unretouched.
3. A Farm Security Administration photograph of an old woman's knotted and gnarled hands is a human and social document of great moment and moving quality.
4. By the imagination and intelligence he possesses and uses, the photographer controls the new esthetic, finds the significant truth and gives it significant form.
5. The opportunities for publishing honest photographs of present-day life in magazines or newspapers are not many.
6. At the turn of the century art got mixed with photography.
7. We may say at once that photography is not art in the old sense. It is not a romantic, impressionistic medium, dependent on subjective factors and ignoring the objective. It is bound to realism in as complex a way as buildings are bound to the earth by the pull of gravitation.
8. A work of art, on this basis, must have meaning, it must have content, it must communicate, it must speak to an audience.
9. For communication, the photograph has qualities equaled by no other pictorial medium. If one wishes to present the interior of a slum dwelling where eight people live in one room, the camera will reveal the riddled floors, the dirty bedding, the dishes stacked unwashed on a table, the thousand and one details that total up to squalor and human degradation. To paint each item completely would take a dozen Hoochs and Chardins many months. Here with the instantaneous blink of the camera eye, we have reality captured, set down for as long as negative and print will endure.
10. photography. For the greatest objective of such work is to widen the world we live in, to acquaint us with the range and variety of human existence, to inform us (as it were forcibly) of unnecessary social horrors such as war, to make us aware of the civilization in which we live and hope to function as creative workers.
McCausland highlights some of the same issues that documentary photographers struggles with to this day. How much of the photographers personality are to be included in their work, but at the same time how much does that influence the work that they produce. If they add too much they remove information from the situation, if they don't add any they they are not telling a story. I think that this article with a couple of changes could have been written in the modern age and people would not questions what McCausland says, its still as true today as it was then. She touches on a couple of ethical and moral points that asks the photographer how honest a photo is, or does the camera always lie thanks to the photographer and their decisions?
On the 21st of May I went to the Saatchi Gallery to see the new Selfie to Self Expression exhibition.
Whether you love them or loathe them selfies are now so much a part of culture that it is hard to get away from. And lets be honnest we have all taken one at some stage. Be it with a friend, in a location or with a celebrity it does not matter. But is it something new? No its not think back, did your parents ever ask someone to take a pic of you in front of wherever you were visiting? Probably, the thing with selfies are that you do not need to bother others you just take it yourself. At first I thought the gallery would be filled with duck faced pouting selfie takers but luckily its not that at all. There is a great range of people taking self portraits and how that it has become something of the norm in society. Here are a couple of the pieces that stood out for me.
http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/richard-long-1525
http://www.tate.org.uk/context-comment/articles/performing-for-the-camera-5-key-artists
http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/dennis-oppenheim-1722
http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/cindy-sherman-1938
http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/john-hilliard-1287
http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/adam-broomberg-16107
D&AD had hosted their festival in the Truman brewery 25-27th of April in east London.
As part of it they had a private view of the next photographer award. 21 young photographers each exhibiting between 4 and 6 images.
Nestled in the heart of the D&AD festival I am sure it is a great for anyone to make it onto the roster of photographers. Before going I thought it might be a lot of fashion or hard to reach photographic styles but in essence most of it were documentary photography.
Here are the images and the photographers that caught my eye.
I really liked this image. What caught my eye was the fact that she was well dressed but everything around her seem to be falling apart, the house in not quite square, the grass is a bit dead, even her friends are not looking in the same direction as she is. Then I read her story and the image had even more meaning.
This is the writeup. "Melanie MacDonald, 22 years old, just finished her study as Bsc Adult Nursing Degree in the Western Isles Hospital in Stornoway. Places are rare in the hospital, but she will not go, she will find something else to do until the opportunity to be recruited as a nurse becomes possible."
This image is one I have seen in person multiple times, two friends sitting and having a chat, I often look at situations like this making up back stories for each unknown person. But here it is spelled out for us. I liked the fact that they both look a little bit like the illustrations on the wall.
This is the writeup. "Niall and Callum, 24 years old, are best friends. Niall works as a diver on a boat in charge of the maintenance of coastal facilities. Callum is at the reception of the unique sociocultural center of the Isle of Lewis, before landing there he tried a singing career in Glasgow but it did not work out, so he came back half-hearted."
I loved seeing these images, they just made me smile to start with and the more I looked at the more I found, I remember listening to my Dad returning from Sweden in the 80s and telling us about ice fishing. Crazy people sitting in the middle of nowhere fishing through a small hole cut into the ice.
I loved the technical thinking that went into this type of photography.
Being South African too I spotted the informal housing (as its called by the government) for what they were before even reading the description.
Reference:
https://www.dandad.org/en/d-ad-next-photographer-award - Accessed 25 April 20127
I had a morning off work and decided to go and visit the Photographers gallery just off Oxford Circus.
There were two very different exhititions on.
On the first floor: Made you look: Dandyism and black masculinity
A selection of both street and studio portraiture, brings together a group of geographically diverse photographers who all explores black masculinity as performance, and personal politics.
Curated by Ekow Eshun the exhibition brings photographers like. Liz Johnson Artur, Larry Dunstan, Samuel Fosso, Hassan Hajjaj, Colin Jones, Isaac Julien, Kristin-Lee Moolman, Jeffery Henson Scales and Malick Sidbé together.
An interview with Ekow Eshun explaining the images behind the exhibit.
Overall it is a very bright and extroverted exhibition. Walking around the gallery it was interesting to see so many photographers taking images of something so similar. Ranging from a the past to modern day.
On floor 4&5 was
Terence Donovan: Speed of Light
A restrospective of legendary photographer Terence Donovan (1936-1996)
A great selection of images by Donovan, showing his range and just the volume of images that he took.
Here is Robin Muir curator of the exhibition explaining a bit more about the exhibition.
The highlight for me was seeing Donovan's notebooks, he meticulously noted down every setup for every scene. Where the lights were, where the camera, the hight of the camera, the speed of the film, the focal length and then some information about what could go wrong. I just loved the detail in the craft but also the cleverness of it, next time you do a shoot that you want a similar look to you don't have to go from memory you have detailed notes on exactly how it was achieved.
The Thermodynamic fashion shoot image for About Town magazine was one of my favourite images of the exhibition.
What I learned: I did not realise that Donovan and Bailey had such similar styles, or was it the style of the time? On some of the images If you said they were Bailey I would not have questioned it. But I guess its the 70s and early 80s black and white images on a white background.
I have read Simon Brainbridges article a couple of times and I have seen the Robbie Cooper Immersion work when it just came out. So I was drawn to it as I never really researched it other than watching the video of the kids playing computer games.
Watching the piece again I just love the concept, you can pause on just about any frame and have a print. The range of emotions or the lack thereof is so contrasting and the audio of the gameplay ads to feeling of each portrait. Would it work as well as an exhibition of still portraits without the video showing the viewer where the still frames came from? I don't think it would, it would be a set of nice portraits but the feeling you get from each of these are from the story gained from watching the video.
In a time where moving portraits have become something that a lot of photographers take this is a study not only of how we react to media but also a reflection of popular culture. This is how people react to the media that they consume (usually behind closed doors).
Has technology enabled this type of project to be made? Yes its shot on a Red Epic which allows a still frame to be taken from any frame due to the sensor size. On the negative is this like fishing with a hand grenade? Where you get capture 25 images every second. With this approach does it kill the "decisive moment" that Cartier-bresson was so well known for? Does it remove the skill of the photographer, where the photographer no longer needs to take the image once they are happy with the frame but rather captures everything. Is this different from modern digital photographers? Yes and no. Yes it is different as you now have 90,000 frames for every hour where modern digtial photographers will have taken anything upwards of 1600 images per day. Compare that to a thirty years ago where ten rolls of film was the norm.
I like the idea and I like the images but the more I look at it the more I question if it is a photography project or a video supported by stills to fill space in galleries?
Jon Levy - Founder Foto8 talking about documentary in the art gallery.
The points I take out of the interview with Levy are
I agree with him that documentary is a form of story telling.
There is ambiguity between journalism and art. Each person viewing a project will have an oppinion on whether it is art or photojournalism.
In the end every story be it art or photo journalism it comes back to the premise of story telling and it's even the criteria for editorial decisions that photo8 makes too.
I agree with Jon, photojournalism or documentary as we know it today is a Westen view of the rest of the world. But with technology it levels the playing field allowing photographers from all over the world to participate in the same forum.
Lastly Jon makes a point about point of view. I think its essential to bring a point of view to a project, but to have that point of view from the start and not in hind sight once the images are printed. The point of view is almost the driving force behind projects.
http://www.martharosler.net/about/index.html In, around and afterthoughts (on documentary photography) - Martha Rosler
Firstly I find Rosler's style of writing hard work, she is one of those writers who sometime uses words that over complicates the sentence for no reason, it also jumps from topic to topic without warning. But with my rant over. This is what I take out of the article.
I feel that Rosler's point of view on documentary photography is quite negative, in each of the examples she gives it is from a negative point of view. So overall I feel that her point of view is that documentary photography is not objective and she does not feel that its got merit as a social cause.
The article starts with referencing the Bowery in New York, which is an archetypal skid row. Photographers have flocked to the Bowery to take photos of the misery within its boundaries. To show those who has more what they should be grateful for. It has also been used to raise funds or awareness of such areas.
Early photography felt like it had more clout when it came to showing despair. Jacob Riis wrote "the sights I saw there gripped my heart until I felt that I must tell of them, or burst." "I wrote, but it seemed to make no impression." With minimal retouching and being a new medium it feels like photographers had the opportunity to make a difference to show "polite society" what they had to be grateful but at the same time play to their "sympathy for the poor". "Yet the force of documentary surely derives in part from that the images might be more decisively unsettling than the arguments enveloping them." I feel that this does not apply to modern day documentary photography. Long gone are the days where images of starving children jolts us out of our seats and into action, even if that action is giving £3 a month for fresh water. It is so crowded with these types of images that we almost don't notice them.
"Documentary is a little like horror movies, putting a face on fear and transforming threat in fantasy, into imagery"
A lot of early liberal documentary photography was based around the notion of "these people can do nothing for themselves" so feel sorry for them rather than, take action like Cesar Chavez, who organised farm workers to fight for themselves.
One of the other points that Rosler raises is that of the bravery of the photographer. As viewers we see these images and we see the "bravery or the manipulativeness and savvy of the photographer who entered a situation of physical, social restrictedness, human decay, or combinations of these and saved us the trouble" This is true for every war image ever seen, I don't want to be there fighting let alone running around with only a camera to defend myself to bring me these images.
But on a good note I thought that the example raised by Rosler of W.Eugene Smith and Aileen Miko Smith who photographed the human devistation in Minamata (a small Japanese fishing village ravaged thanks to Chisso chemical firm dumping mercury-laden wast into the waters) was a good reason to tell the rest of the world, not for profit of the photographers but for the awareness that this chemical company caused this amount of harm to the people around it, and it could have been avoided. Other communities around the world stood up and ensured that their towns did not turn into Minamata. If photography has this effect it has to be positive even though the subject it not.
Edward S Curtis was the opposite of the Smith family, he changed the perception people had of Native North American people by arriving with a modern day props and wardrobe department. Not only did he dress his sitters he also retouched his images for his discerning buyers. He made documentary that would sell for the highest price not documentary about something real. "The higher the price that the photography can command as a commodity in dealerships, the higher the status accorded to it in museums and galleries, the greater will be the gap between that kind of documentary and another kind, a documentary incorporated into an explicit analysis of society and at least the beginning of a program for changing it"
and I agree wholeheartedly with the statement
"The liberal documentary, in which members of the ascendant classes are implored to have pity on and to rescue members of the oppressed, now belongs to the past"
Advertising is known for bending the truth and when it comes to photography it is littered with copies and remakes and lazy creative ideas. Its much easier to take an existing well known image and apply a brand to it than it is to create something original. Advertisers will usually take the easy option, pick something that is already known so we don't have to spend the money to get it known. This is the same for the Visa advert 1979. Elliot Erwitt created an image in the 1950s for the French office of tourism. It was then recreated (almost to the T) by a producer for the 1979 commercial.
Personally I have a problem with taking photos of the down and out, the drunks, the homeless. I find taking images of people who have nothing, degrading to that person. As a photographer what are you gaining or changing in society when you take an image of a homeless person? The simple answer is that its much easier to walk up to someone who lives on the street and take a photo of them than it is to take one of someone who you feel is superior to you, in either class or financial standing. I very often see photographers trade on their portrait ability with black and white images of scruffy men with big beards, over processed images with added sharpness and added grain to show every blemish and every imperfection. These images are meant to show how good a photographer is but in essence it shows everything but what I would want to see from a portrait photographer. As an example Lee Jeffries did a series on the homeless. I like some if the images but for some reason I have no empathy for the people in the images. I just feel that he is building his reputation and further earning potential on someone who will never see a dime of that money. Just like Florence Thompson who never saw a dime after becoming the face of "the worlds most reproduced photograph" Dorothea Lange profited from that image and built a reputation on it whereas Thompson was never rewarded.
In hindsight even though Rosler's article was hard to read I feel very strongly about some of the topics she raised and it has made me think more than I first thought it would.
References
‘In, Around and Afterthoughts (on Documentary Photography)’ by Martha Rosler in Bolton, R. (ed.) (1992) The Contest of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (p.303).
The myth of objectivity
When I read
Bazin’s statement it reads like someone who has fallen in love. It’s
optimistic, it looks past all the flaws and faults and finds the positive. The
main positive, the positive that existed in 1945 more so than today. If we look
at the number of images Bazin took in 1945 versus the 35 images per second that
digital cameras can take today it was more considered the photographers had to
take their time to compose the image and take it, they could not move the
camera around the scene as easily as we can today. So there may have been a
sense that what photographers took were more real than the images today, each
image had to be though through.
But at the same time what Bazin does not mention is the ability to frame a subject and its surroundings and by doing so change the context of the image. An image of a single woman standing in a doorway has a very different meaning to the same woman standing in the same doorway with two children in tattered clothing around her. So by the simple act of capturing a moment in time even down to the moment that photographer presses the button (are they blinking, are they looking down are their hair a mess) is an act of selection and curation. In modern day photography we can shoot a multitude of frames and pick the best but it is no different to the two or three images that photographers had at the time of Bazin, the selection process of what to capture in the frame remains the same.
I love the fact that photography of monuments were seen as cheaper options than visiting them even in 1851.
Quoting from the metmuseum website
"In 1851, the Commission des Monuments Historiques, an agency of the French government, selected five photographers to make photographic surveys of the nation’s architectural patrimony. These Missions Héliographiques, as they were called, were intended to aid the Paris-based commission in determining the nature and urgency of the preservation and restoration of work required at historic sites throughout France. The French rail network was still in its infancy and many of the commissioners had never visited the monuments in their care; photography promised a record of such sites that would be produced more quickly and accurately than the architectural drawings on which they had previously relied."
The article continues that even when the photographers returned and 4 out of 5 shot on glass rather than paper, all the negatives were files in order not to publish the images which seems like a waste. But then again if they sent 5 architects to make drawings of each of those, would they have been publicised? I guess at the stage the medium was so functional that people saw it as just a cheaper version of architectural drawing.
Roger Fenton
Somehow I took a liking to Fenton's work, I have seen it in magazines and photobooks countless times but I could not tell you who the photographer was or what the photos were of. The one thing I remember about looking at the famous image "The valley of the shadow of death." Was always that it was a road with lots of canon balls in it, and no trees what so ever. Looking through some of the other images Fenton took during this time it becomes a "where is wally" type of thing where you start looking for trees, even when you think you have spotted them they are usually ship masts.
Update: I did this research before doing the Short history of Documentary photography piece. I now know a whole lot more about Fenton.
Talking about research:
https://www.redeye.org.uk/programme/events/photographers-and-research-idea-process-and-project
Resources
http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/heli/hd_heli.htm
http://www.allworldwars.com/Crimean-War-Photographs-by-Roger-Fenton-1855.html
1. the truth about modern music
2.leap of faith
3. 4th term Royalist
4. Can you hear me mother?
5 Too shy!
1. Endgame - the Musical
or
"My old man's a dustman - 'e wears a dustman's 'at..."
1 - What happens when you treat my soul music like sold out music
2 - Most inventive way to get into a bar
3 - Never judge a gal by her shoes
4 - Technological institutionalisation
5 - The dark arts of the internet (the cat that wanted to be a meme)
1. You can hear me but you can't see me
2. Stag weekend
3. Puppet love
4. Can you hear me?
5. Go on, I dare you
The truth about the 5 images
1. A busker in Bath playing pretty good music for someone stuck in a bin.
2. Pamplona Festival has a couple of interesting traditions, one of them is that all the statues are greased up, making them impossible to scale without help. Once you are up there is only one way down. The only side rule is that, if you did not help the next person up, you may not be caught.
3. This is an image of me dressed as the queen. It was for a viral video made where The Queen challenged someone to run a race. I was recruited for the job in the morning with no idea that we would be escorted out of Heathrow by the British transport police, who were heavily armed.
4. An old man who I see often. He received a mobile phone (as a present), but Brick lane is not conducive to mobile calls at the best of time. Once I spoke to him we realised he had the phone at its lowest volume and it had been like this for the three months he had the handset. I've never seen him on the phone since.
5. Alley cat, our little stray that walked in one day and stayed. It's been 12 years, and he is still as happy as this, his first night off the street.
To be fair I did pick some of the most obscure images I had to push the boundaries of what the discontinuities to these images would be.
1. I think that most people got the idea of the busker quickly, its something we are used to seeing, a busker trying to impress by doing something odd. Everyone got the concept of what was going on in the image and it was not surprising for the viewer to see someone sitting inside a bin, playing music to the public. Some of the give aways, that also featured as visual clues were the open guitar case in front of the bin.
2. Pamplona festival was a lot harder to decipher, without the knowledge that it is at a very male dominated (even though some comments got this part right) mucho event where most of the activities are life threatening, makes this image a lot harder to associate with, as with the busker.
3. The less information I gave the viewer the more obscure the answers around them became. Here I presented an image of someone, presumably a male, dressed as the queen, with three corgis in tow. Without the knowledge of it being an advert for something else the viewers took it at face value and let their imaginations run wild.
4. This was similar to the image above where, without context people had no framework to judge the image by. The one common thread was the realisation that it was an old person trying to talk on a modern phone and that can only be gained through life experience and the generalisation that the older generation struggles with technology. This was something I hoped to get out of this image, I wanted to see if people would use their day to day experience and conceptions and attach it to an image without being told to do so. From a learning point of view this image has taught me how we use our everyday life experiences and apply it to images as a filer.
5. Again this was an image that we could all relate to, a friendly cat indoors, the main difference here is that I see a cat smiling and no one else sees that. Meaning that I have an emotional connection to the facial expressions of a cat, whereas no one else sees it that way...
As I said in one of the previous posts, what we shoot are shot with one eye, to see the world you need both and to understand it you need to see it through a thousand others. These five images have shown that without a tight framework to judge images by we see images as we experience life and each one will be different.
]]>What makes a document?
Rob says that ‘any photograph is inherently a document’ and I agree with him on this. If we break it down and we remove the romance and pretence out of what the art of image making is, everyone who has a camera makes documents of events in the past. Currently we alter those moments by adding Instagram filters or Snapchat text over the top of them to make them seem better than they are. We add #discriptivehashtags to explain what our photos are supposed to mean but most likely the only reason we go to these lengths are to get more recognition from our friends/peers/fans. I think that Jose sums it up perfectly in his post where he says "So no matter how hard we try there is no guarantee that what we want to say with our pictures will be ‘heard’ by the viewer. We have no control over the cultural context our images will be shown or the cultural baggage of the viewer." To cut out all the cultural context and baggage modern day photographers tell the viewer what the image is about, they tell the viewer what the context is and they tell the viewer what they think the viewer should think of it. All hidden in a hashtag like this
#man_with_his_old_dog___who_survived_the_earthquake___we_should_all_feel_blessed_that_we_are_not_in_their_shoes___now_share_my_photo_with_your_friends_to_raise_awareness.
I feel that Anned explains this perfectly in their response. "I think the story supplied by Jose is what makes this photograph a document – whether a family photograph documenting family history or a photograph which allows us to see an aspect of Spanish history. Without the date, the place, the personal knowledge it would be very much less reliable as a document."
If we look at what we have created, is a file, it's labeled a .JPG file (most of the time) but with the amount of descriptions that we are adding to it, is it that much different to a word document? Are we now making mini powerpoint/keynote presentations every time we post an image? No longer is an image enough, we have to add text, cropping and and usually a generous helping of filters. Is that in itself not a description of a document? Lets think about it like this, if I said to a viewer that I spent 30 minutes on an slide of a presentation, I added an image which I spent some time removing unwanted elements like blemishes, I added some text and I added a description to the slide and lastly added a look to the slide by applying a cross process filter to the overall slide. I then saved the slide and posted it to instagram, is it a photo or a document? I lean towards a document.
Another documentary filmed and directed by Gavin Searle.
A glimpse into the surreal world of all things fish in Japan. In a six weeks tip around the country and its islands, presenter Charles Rangeley-Wilson with his guide Nobuaki Koide go in search of what the facination the Japanese have with fish. From Yellow fin tuna to giant Koi costing in the region of 100 000 yen each. Its a documentary aimed at looking at fish and the way the Japanese see fish and how their view differ from the western world. Its not a documentary about conservation but more one about consumption. The Japanese for example has no problem with eating fish that is still wriggling around on their plate, neither do they have a problem with eating whale meat.
Looking at it critically the documentary shies away from any of the sustainability issues but I guess this is a look into the fascination with fish not a documentary about the conservation of fish and within that lies the distinction. By sticking to a "theme" and a direction it allows it to explore ideas and helps the viewer to look at it open-mindedly. The viewer is not asked to take a side, but to purely indulge in the differences, its left up to the viewer to decide if they agree with those points of view, which I think is an interesting way of presenting. By doing it this way makes the documentary feel less forced into a point of view.
BBC,. Fish! A Japanese Obsession. 2014. Web. 7 Apr. 2016.
Today I watched one of a three part documentary by director/cameraman Gavin Searle, called Welcome to Lagos.
It was centred around a group of men and women who works as recyclers in the rubbish dumps in Lagos. Having immersed himself in the group Searle gets responses and access to the group that can only be obtained through trust. Spending time with the group the viewer gets an insight into the hardship and difficulty these men and woman face to make a living but through it we also see that these people are more positive and entrepreneurial than most of the people you and I know in our lives.
As I said in my research on the history of photography I am going to try and stick to the 5 questions about photography to at least try and view each piece critically rather than at face value.
Who Took the Photograph?
The 3 part series was directed and filmed by Gavin Searle.
Why and For Whom Was the Photograph Taken?
It was a commission done for BBC Two to document the hardship and lives of the people in those situations.
How Was the Photograph Taken?
It was shot on a range of cameras, some were professional broadcast cameras and some of the footage were shot by the people themselves with cheaper hand held cameras.
What Can Companion Images Tell Us?
Watching two of the three documentaries has shown me that the essence of the films are the same and the positivity by the people are reflected in both.
How Was the Photograph Presented?
It was broadcast on BBC two and is distributed by the BBC. It has been uploaded to Vimeo.com too.
Was it skewed in a direction? It has to be, thats what documentary is all about, it's shot with one eye. Just like when we close one eye we lose depth perception, the same thing happens when one person directs and shoots a documentary there are bound to be an opinion, a point of view. For this one I feel it was probably the feel good factor and the positivity that Searle finds in each of the characters. But the truth is still that these people find themselves in dire situations, situations that would be very difficult to explain was it not for the film footage that puts you into that scene.
I feel that its a brave series to make, to go and spend time in those conditions and to get close to these characters and their environment must have been scary at times. But as Robert Kapa said, “If your photographs aren't good enough, you're not close enough" and this is one of those instances where a documentary made out of the comfort of a London studio would not have had the impact this series has.
References
BBC2,. 2009. Web. 5 Apr. 2016.
A brief history in early documentary photography.
"the term “documentary” was first used by John Grierson in 1926" but documentary images were being made much earlier than this the photographers just did not call it that at the stage. - http://www.gaslight.me.uk/archives/2802
1819 Roger Fenton is born, a student of the painter Paul Delaroche and now Vice-Chairman of the Photographic Society of London, was one of the first to make the distinction between reportage and High Art.
1854 Fenton became one of the first war photographers, when he photographed the Crimean war. Fenton avoided making pictures of dead, injured or mutilated soldiers. Fenton managed to make over 350 usable large format negatives during this trip.
1855 Felice Beato and Robertson travelled to Balaklava, Crimea, where they took over reportage of the Crimean War following Roger Fenton's departure. In contrast to Fenton's depiction of the dignified aspects of war, Beato and Robertson showed the destruction. They had no problem depicting corpses.
1857 Felice Beato photographed the second Opium war. His influence in Japan, where he taught and worked with numerous other photographers and artists, ensured that he became synonymous with documentary photography in his time. He also became the first to document a military campaign as it unfolded. Dating each image gave the viewer a timeline.
1857 Beato's photographs the Second Opium War.
1858 Felice Beato arrived in India and began travelling throughout Northern India to document the aftermath of the Indian Rebellion of 1857. During this time he produced possibly the first-ever photographic images of corpses. It is believed that for at least one of his photographs taken at the palace of Sikandar Bagh in Lucknow he had the skeletal remains of Indian rebels disinterred or rearranged to heighten the photograph's dramatic impact.
1860 John Thomson produced some of the earliest images of the newly discovered Angkor Wat in Cambodia after spending two weeks at the site. After this Thomson spent time taking portraits of the Cambodian Royal family before returning to Britain.
1861, Mathew Brady gets permission from President Lincoln himself to photograph the civil war, as long as Brady finances it himself. He sets out and takes his mobile studio and darkroom to the battlefield. Even though most images are taken after the battle he gets caught in direct cross fire in the First Battle of Bull Run.
1861 Brady recruits 23 photographers including names like Alexander Gardner,[10] James Gardner, Timothy H. O'Sullivan, William Pywell, to do the photography on his behalf, he acts more as director than physical camera operator. As a result many of the images in Brady’s collection are, in reality, thought to be the work of his assistants.
1862 the organising committee for the International Exhibition in London announced its plans to place photography, not with the other fine arts as had been done in the Manchester Art Treasures Exhibition only five years earlier, but in the section reserved for machinery, tools and instruments - photography was considered a craft, for tradesmen. For Fenton and many of his colleagues, this was conclusive proof of photography's diminished status, some of the pioneers drifted away.
1862 Brady opened an exhibition of photographs from the Battle of Antietam in his New York gallery titled "The Dead of Antietam." This was the first time that many Americans saw the realities of war in photographs rather than the usual sketches of war.
1862, O'Sullivan followed the campaign of Maj. Gen. John Pope's Northern Virginia Campaign. He had forty-four photographs published in the first Civil War photographs collection.
1863, O'Sullivan created his most famous photograph, "The Harvest of Death," depicting dead soldiers from the Battle of Gettysburg.
1863, Fenton sells his equipment and returns to the law as a barrister.
1864, O'Sullivan following Gen. Ulysses S. Grant's trail, he photographed the Siege of Petersburg before briefly heading to North Carolina to document the siege of Fort Fisher.
1865, John Thomson undertook a series of photographs of the King of Siam and other senior members of the royal court and government.
1869, O'Sullivan was the official photographer on the United States Geological Exploration of the Fortieth Parallel. His role was to take photos of the West to attract settlers. (again if one is being paid to document an area with this goal in mind, can it be done objectively?) He became one of the first geo-photographers, making images about the land, unindustrialised land.
1869 William Henry Jackson won a commission from the Union Pacific to document the scenery along the various railroad routes for promotional purposes. Only a few months separate Jackson's commision from O'Sullivan's.
1870 the sale of his albums had become the mainstay of Beato's business. (is this the start where documentrary is photographed with one eye on the reward?)
1870 O'Sullivan joined a survey team in Panama to survey for a canal across the Isthmus.
1871 Beato served as official photographer with the United States naval expedition of Admiral Rodgers to Korea.
1877 Beato sold most of his stock to the firm Stillfried & Andersen,[32] who then moved into his studio. Beato retired to become a trader, but this did not work out too well.
1881 Thomson was appointed photographer to the British Royal Family by Queen Victoria, from this point on he concentrated on studio photography, where he photographed the rich and famous which was a much easier way to earn a living than tracking around in treacherous conditions as he did before.
1885 Beato was the official photographer of the expeditionary forces led by Baron (later Viscount) G.J. Wolseley to Khartoum, Sudan.
1886, Beato lectured the London and Provincial Photographic Society on photographic techniques.
1896 Edward S. Curtis began a survey of Indian Life in North America.
1896, Brady dies, pennyless, the US Congress paid only $25,000 for his war photos, where it cost him over $100,000 to produce this bankrupted him as the public and private investors just wanted to forget about the harrowing images of the war. A bit of trivia, Brady did photograph 18 of the 19 American Presidents from John Quincy Adams to William McKinley missing out on William Henry Harrison, who died in office three years before Brady started.
1909, Beato dies in Florence, Italy, by this time Beato became known as much of a business man as he was a photographer, with a string of businesses from health insurance to silver trade. For the next 50 years his images of Asia are the mainstay of images published in travel journals and helps shape the way the West sees Asia.
1930 saw the Farm Security Administration funded a number of luminaries to record the plight of farmers during the Depression. These photographers, including Walter Evans, Ben Shahn, Dorothea Lange and others produced “the most important example of a state-funded documentary project in the world” (Wells p97) and included iconic works such as Lange’s Migrant Mother.
1942 After his death Jackson was honoured by the Explorer's Club for his 80,000 photographs of the American West, Mount Jackson in the Yellowstone National park is named in honour of Jackson for his contribution towards convincing US Congress to create the first national park in 1872.
I downloaded the atricle Making Sense of Documentary Photography by James Curtis to see what I could learn about the history and more so the truthfulness of documentary photography as we know it. Following are a couple of excerpts i found interesting and my comments below them.
http://historymatters.gmu.edu/mse/photos/photos.pdf
"A picture may be worth a thousand words, but you need to know how to analyse the picture to gain any understanding of it at all."
"Susan Sontag captured the essence of that faith in her
monumental reverie On Photography when she wrote “Photographed images do not
seem to be statements about the world so much as pieces of it.”"
"In the aftermath of the 1863 battle of Gettysburg, photographer Alexander
Gardner ordered that one of the fallen bodies be dragged forty yards and propped in a
rocky corner. The resulting image, Rebel Sharpshooter in Devil’s Den, continues to
command attention despite the recent discovery of the photographer’s manipulations."
"Documentary photographs are more than expressions of artistic skill; they are conscious
acts of persuasion. "
"But how did Riis gain the cooperation of these stealthy and suspicious subjects? He hired the young “toughs” in this picture to reenact a common crime by having them mug one of their own. He then paid all the boys with cigarettes."
Why and For Whom Was the Photograph Taken?
"Lewis Hine took many of his most famous photographs while working for social
reform agencies, such as New York’s Charity Organization Society and the National
Child Labor Committee."
Rothstein neglected to identify his main subject as the village elder who stood proudly before his extended James Curtis, “Making Sense of Documentary Photography,” page 10 family. The man was a grandfather and great grandfather, and this is a multigenerational portrait. The fathers of the children do not appear in the picture, either because Rothstein excluded them or because they were working at the time the photo was taken."
By doing this Rothstein let the viewer believe that each of these families were this large with only one father to all these children. Without any further reference readers of magazines where these images were published took them as gospel and did not question the images influencing an entire nation into believing something that was in the interest of the photographer.
How Was the Photograph Taken?
"Even with subsequent advances in film speed and camera technology, documentary
photographers of the 1930s continued to direct the actions of their subjects, although
they steadfastly denied doing so. Walker Evans was the most outspoken of the FSA
photographers in his renunciation of any arrangements prior to exposure. Yet Evans’s
camera of choice was a bulky 8X10 view camera that had to be mounted on a tripod.
James Curtis, “Making Sense of Documentary Photography,” page 11
Like Riis, he needed the cooperation of his subjects, who agreed to remain motionless
while he made the exposure. If they moved, they would blur the image. Evans chose the
large view camera" I think the reason people do not question images like this is because we take images at face value, 99% of people do not know or even care what equipment was used and could care even less about the difficulty the photographer had to make the image. So it is understandable that the photographers of this era had to pose their subjects. But are they then becoming studio photographers on location?
What Can Companion Images Tell Us?
"Near the small hamlet of Smithland, Lee took a series of
pictures of a tenant farmer struggling to make a living on a landscape that had been
ravaged by drought. The photograph below shows the farmer’s children standing at a
table eating dinner on Christmas day. The place at the head of the table is vacant and
the image raises the troubling prospect of parental abandonment." "Lee was
asked about the circumstances surrounding Christmas Dinner in Iowa. Lee remembered
the name of the farmer, Earl Pauley, and recalled taking a number of pictures on the
farm. He told an interviewer that Pauley was a widower and was doing his best to
provide for his needy children. These recollections added power and poignancy to Lee’s
portrait.
Yet in this instance, Lee’s memory betrayed him, for the FSA file contains a
photograph of Pauley’s wife standing in the doorway of the shack with two of the
children who later posed for the dinner photograph. This hitherto unpublished image
provides clear evidence that Lee assigned places at the dinner table. He asked the father
to step out of the scene but never made room for the mother. Her presence would have
undercut the dramatic scene that Lee had in mind."
This clearly shows that this again was not an image of the truth but one thought up by the photographer. Without this companion image the viewer will be none the wiser.
Image: Russell Lee, Christmas Dinner in Iowa, 1936
How Was the Photograph Presented?
"To illustrate how families were victimized when the head of the household could no longer work, Hine posed an amputee father in the foreground with the man’s wife and four children slightly to the rear. From a standpoint of composition and aesthetic design, the image left much to be desired"
Here the title of the image makes the image more powerful, it tells the viewer what to think. But by the actions of the photographer this is no longer a documentary photo. Or is it?
Image: Lewis Hine, One Arm and Four Children, 1910
Something else to look at that might be interesting is the 1930's and 1940s in colour flickr group published by the library of congress.
"A Brief History Of Documentary Photography - Gaslight Photography". Gaslight Photography. N.p., 2013. Web. 10 May 2016.
"Alexander Gardner (Photographer)". Wikipedia. N.p., 2016. Web. 10 May 2016.
"Documentary Photography: Characteristics, History". Visual-arts-cork.com. N.p., 2016. Web. 10 May 2016.
"Early Documentary Photography | Essay | Heilbrunn Timeline Of Art History | The Metropolitan Museum Of Art". The Met’s Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. N.p., 2016. Web. 10 May 2016.
"Felice Beato". Wikipedia. N.p., 2016. Web. 10 May 2016.
"John Thomson (Photographer)". Wikipedia. N.p., 2016. Web. 10 May 2016.
"Mathew Brady". Wikipedia. N.p., 2016. Web. 10 May 2016.
"Robert J. Flaherty". Wikipedia. N.p., 2016. Web. 10 May 2016.
"Roger Fenton". Wikipedia. N.p., 2016. Web. 10 May 2016.
"Timothy H. O'sullivan". Wikipedia. N.p., 2016. Web. 10 May 2016.
"William Henry Jackson". Wikipedia. N.p., 2016. Web. 10 May 2016.
Curtis, James. N.p., 2016. Web. 15 Feb. 2016.
Francisco Goya's etchings The Disasters of War vs Civil War photographs by Mathew Brady
The first thing that comes to mind when looking at these two sets of images are that the one if the fiction of someones imagination and the other is a true representation of a real event. Even though both are real the viewer has more empathy with the photos than with the etchings, the people are real, so you feel something towards them whereas the etchings are just representations of people.
"photographs are inevitably colored by the photographer's personal interests, attitudes, and prejudices.' " I feel that viewers see this in etching but not in photographs, we want to believe that the photos are real and that they are objective.
"Photographs are transparent. We see the world through them." This is the line that sums up the piece the best for me. When viewing photos we are not looking at the truth but we are looking at those images and adding our own experiences, wants, needs, views. By doing so we attach meaning and emotion to those images which makes them more real than what they may seem. As Walton says, photography is not more real than a painting or a sketch of the same object but due to the detail and what we want to look at in that image we interpret the photo as the one that is real and the other as objects of someones imagination.
After reading the piece I must say I never even tried to compare images and paintings and thinking about how I interpret different mediums. In the future I will be aware of it.
Firstly listening to Gavin you can tell that she is from a print background with an invested interest in print as she starts out by explaining how print still offers better controls in terms of colour rendering than digital on screen renditions. Don't get me wrong, I love paging through a nicely printed set of pages but in my opinion modern screens are much better at rendering colour than they were ten years ago and the differences between monitors are no longer the sticking point they used to be. But for a dwindling print market its still something to hold onto.
I think that each of the the three words that Gavin describes stills has some relevance. In my mind documentary is the over arching idea but things like reportage and photojournalism are forms of documentary. I agree that between reportage and photo journalism the lines are more blurred but for me they are both forms of documentary.
As Gavin says the lines are blurring between fine art and documentary and I like the idea of a fine art documentary, why does documentary have to be gritty black and white images of war torn areas, why can't it be an artistic take about something beautiful?
Could it be how the viewer sees the photographer and the preconceptions of what the photographer usually produces that categorises the work. A fine art photographer will have a hard time doing a piece on war but it could be much more interesting as it will see war from a different point of view. As Gavin rightly points out there are more woman producing more work which in itself will produce work that is fundamentally different to what was made before.
Joseph Rodriguez on Egg
An interesting insight into Joseph Rodriguez and his gang documentary. Looking at some of his images it gives me the feeling that he embeds himself with the groups and that he then poses some of the images once the people are comfortable with him and his camera. Is that wrong of a photo journalist to pose his sitters? I guess that is Gavin's point on why we need words like Photo Journalism and Reportage.
I have more questions than answers from watching Gavin's piece. Hopefully as I go through the course some of those will be answered.
Had a quick chat with Simon about the course and he suggested some interesting photographers to look at.
Laura Panner
Don McCullen
Simon Norfolk
Bruce Gilden - Street Photographer - Jumps out at people. Has no shame about taking a portrait of someone, I always feel that I have to ask that I am somehow inconveniencing a person. Have to try and do a day of photography like Gilden (might have to go with a friend as backup)
Quotes
"There is no such think like subjective photography. You choose where to stand and what to photograph, there is no such thing as subjective photography."
Chris Killip
http://www.chriskillip.com/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/photography/11145782/Chris-Killip-In-Flagrante.html?frame=3064296